You are here

TKI selection trends - A discussion with Dr. Jorge Cortes

Categories:

Patient Goals and Concomitant Needs Help Guide TKI Selection in CML - a conversation with Dr. Jorge Cortes

https://www.onclive.com/view/patient-goals-and-concomitant-needs-help-gu...

Jorge Cortes, MD, discusses available TKIs and how to navigate optimal treatment selection for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.

"What are the next steps for TKI and CML research?
One of the areas where CML is still deficient is in treatment discontinuation. We've made tremendous progress since we started using TKIs. We were happy with the progress, but we just assumed that the patients will be taking them for the rest of their lives. When we realized that there was a subset of patients who could stop therapy, that became fantastic, but the reality is that today is only roughly 25% to 30% of all patients [with CML] can successfully stop therapy. That's good, but it's not even half of patients."

I wonder. If a gastric acid-reducing agent reduces the absorption of dasatinib, is the effective dose of dasatinib also reduced? I take a PPI many hours after taking dasatinib, but if I were to take 50mg of dasatinib at the same time as the PPI, would we say that, effectively, I had only taken an effective 20mg, for instance?

The current FDA label for SPRYCEL (dasatinib) explicitly states:

“Do not administer H₂ antagonists or proton pump inhibitors with SPRYCEL. Consider the use of antacids in place of H₂ antagonists or proton pump inhibitors.”
It recommends antacids (if needed) be taken at least 2 hours before or after dasatinib, because simultaneous use still reduces exposure.
Clinical data cited in the label and supporting studies show clear reductions:
Omeprazole (40 mg) given ~22 hours before a 100 mg dasatinib dose reduced AUC by ~43% and Cₘₐₓ by ~42%.
Famotidine (H₂RA, but mechanistically similar) reduced AUC and Cₘₐₓ by 61% and 63%.

Real-world and controlled DDI studies report bioavailability reductions of 40–80% (some recent pharmacokinetic studies with precise pH control show even higher reductions, up to ~89–96% in worst-case timing).

This means a PPI can meaningfully lower the effective dasatinib dose you actually get into your bloodstream, potentially reducing efficacy (e.g., poorer disease control in CML or Ph+ ALL) unless the dose is adjusted or monitored therapeutically.

Newer dasatinib formulations (e.g., Phyrago™, XS004/Dasynoc, or amorphous solid-dispersion versions) were specifically developed to be pH-independent. These have minimal or no clinically significant interaction with PPIs and can be taken together. If you are on one of these, the answer changes. Always confirm which brand/formulation you have.

Alternatives if you need acid suppression: Use short-acting antacids (separated by ≥2 hours) instead of PPIs or H₂RAs. Some patients switch to H₂RAs with careful timing as you are doing, but the label still suggests avoiding them.

Clinical implication: Many real-world studies show PPI co-use with standard dasatinib is surprisingly common despite warnings and is linked to higher rates of treatment failure or need for dose escalation/monitoring.

Bottom line: For standard (Sprycel) dasatinib, yes — it “requires” gastric acid, and a PPI will reduce the effective dose. Talk to your oncologist or pharmacist about your specific formulation, possible therapeutic drug monitoring of dasatinib levels, or switching acid-suppression strategies. Be sure to discuss this with your doctor.

Dasatinib anhydrous might also be an option, if available. It’s a reformulation of dasatinib that doesn’t need stomach acid.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-023-02045-1